Yugen | Just mentioning atheists is considered too controversial.

Just mentioning atheists is considered too controversial.


Are you sitting down? Got some smelling salts available near by? Prepared to clutch your pearls? Well then take a look at this horrible bus ad the NEPA Freethought Society wanted to run in Pennsylvania!

Awful, right? That’s why the ad was rejected outright by the bus company:

Jim Smith, the advertising contact at COLTS, said that the reason for refusal — appealing to the very questionable and vague advertising policyof COLTS — was that COLTS does not accept ads which could be deemed controversial or otherwise spark public debate.

The ironic part? This ad was created specifically to be as inoffensive as possible,inspired by this idea from Richard Wade:

In the continuing debate over the benefits and drawbacks of “in your face” atheist billboards versus “soft sell” atheist billboards, the assertion that the religious public will claim that they’re “offended” whether the message is strident or mild is frequently put forward.

As a good skeptic, I thought that perhaps this proposition should be put to a test. So in a half-serious, half-lighthearted spirit, I propose that we try displaying billboards that are truly innocuous, so that the only thing that might provoke “offense” would be the word “atheist” in the billboard sponsor’s name. Then we would see if the claim is true that “our mere existence is what offends them.”

So yes, it’s not just controversial to say that the claims made by religions are false. It’s not just controversial to say that atheists can be moral. It’s controversial to say the word “atheist” because our existence implicitly says that we think the religious beliefs of others are wrong.



  1. raakkel reblogged this from lipsredasroses
  2. claustrophobic-mind reblogged this from lipsredasroses
  3. ladybonerforvangogh reblogged this from ladyromanahasmoved
  4. beccabei reblogged this from lipsredasroses
  5. causticartistry reblogged this from lipsredasroses
  6. lickmybrain reblogged this from lipsredasroses
  7. shewhodancesunderthemoon reblogged this from lipsredasroses
  8. fluffyfemme reblogged this from doulaness
  9. sohma-sohma reblogged this from aloverstale
  10. undinae reblogged this from lipsredasroses
  11. magpiesolo reblogged this from danikasapphistry
  12. gothswilleateryoursoul reblogged this from starcrossed-sky and added:
    Bluh bluh bluh why are people so unfair. I’m a devout Catholic and I would have absolutely no problem with this ad. I’d...
  13. ladystain reblogged this from hermione-ganja
  14. starcrossed-sky reblogged this from w3djyt
  15. hugsfromclara reblogged this from gallifreyfieldsforever
  16. notlikethecountry reblogged this from gallifreyfieldsforever
  17. dirkpee reblogged this from sewallyfrustrated
  18. w3djyt reblogged this from lipsredasroses
  19. crognak reblogged this from lipsredasroses
  20. misplacedsanity reblogged this from neopocalypse
  21. troy-and-abed-now-on-tummmmblr reblogged this from neopocalypse
  22. skip-to-the-end reblogged this from hermione-ganja
  23. hermione-ganja reblogged this from lipsredasroses
  24. thisisadrienne reblogged this from lipsredasroses
  25. winterofcontent reblogged this from sanityscraps
  26. sewallyfrustrated reblogged this from atheist-me
  27. sucharodthing reblogged this from oodlyenough
  28. cyberniquedoll reblogged this from another-vegan-feminist
  29. another-vegan-feminist reblogged this from lipsredasroses
  30. shiisa reblogged this from gallifreyfieldsforever
  31. someliberalopinions reblogged this from gallifreyfieldsforever and added:
    I’m afraid we are taking strides backwards in terms of religious freedom, which directly contradicts one of the reasons...
  32. touchmyudder reblogged this from lipsredasroses
Top of Page